Let us create a 3D eBook for you!
Let us create a 3d Digital eBook for you! DigyCat.com

Requirements To Produce Tax Information (Whats Up With That?)


"What we've got here is a failure to communicate."
--Strother Martin in Cool Hand Luke

Statutory Law

Governments pass laws, it's what they do. It is the job of others to interpret the laws that Parliament has made.

Statutory Construction

It is "presume[d] that the legislature avoids superfluous or meaningless words, that it does not pointlessly repeat itself or speak in vain. Every word in a statute is presumed to make sense and to have a specific role to play in advancing the legislative purpose": Tower v. M.N.R., [2004] 1 F.C. 183 (F.C.A.) per MALONE J.A. per curium at para. 15.

Also Communities Economic Development Fund v. Canadian Pickles Corp., [1991] 3 S.C.R. 388, per IACOBUCCI, J. at page 408Interpretation of the Canadian Income Tax Act ("ITA") in practice is primarily done by the Canada Revenue Agency ("CRA"); followed closely by tax accountants and lawyers with the tying vote going to the Courts.

The Legislative Purpose

To raise money and implement federal policies.

The Accounting/Legal Purpose

To assist taxpayers to legally structure their affairs so as to minimize the taxes they must pay: IRC v. Westminster, [1936] A.C. 1 (H.L.), at p. 19 and Stubart Investments Ltd. v. The Queen, [1984] 1 S.C.R. 536 (S.C.C.), at p. 540.

It is not difficult to foresee that the legislative objective and private sector tax adviser will frequently disagree. While CRA wins many such arguments by default (e.g., the taxpayer can't, or won't, fight) for those that do contest a restrictive or erroneous interpretation of the ITA, there is a heartening rate of success.

A caveat should be interjected here, this presumes challenges where have been made thoughtfully; that is, were CRA "got it wrong" and the taxpayer has called them on it. Frivolous challenged or specious arguments (i.e., R. v. Klundert) are not going to succeed.

Legislative Tools

In order to expedite the collection of taxes Parliament has given CRA broad powers to enforce the ITA, some require taxpayers to cooperate under a compulsion of law.

While such compulsion may be permissible in the civil context (R. v. McKinlay Transport Ltd., [1990] 1 S.C.R. 627), the same is not true if the information sought or seized by CRA will be used to prosecute the taxpayer for an offence under the ITA (R. v. Jarvis [2002] 3 S.C.R. 757; s. 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms).

Thus the following material assumes a CRA civil audit, but if you believe that in your situation CRA abused these provisions while you were under a criminal prosecution (e.g., s. 239(1)(d) ITA for evasion) then obtain immediately legal advice.

S. 230(1) ITA: Books & Records

Every "person" carrying on business or required to pay, or collect, taxes under the ITA is required to keep records and books of account at their place of business or residence. What books? Enough to enable you to calculate the taxes and for CRA to see that you did it correctly. "Person" includes corporations (s. 248(1) ITA).

This ties into with the obligation on each Canadian taxpayer to estimate the amount of the taxes payable in any taxation year under s. 151 ITA.

S. 231.1(1) ITA: Inspect, Audit & Examine Books

Someone from CRA may, enter your place of business to inspect, audit or examine your books and records, or those of another taxpayer, to see you fulfilled your obligation under s. 151, above. They may not enter your home without a search warrant, unless you invite them in.

Although the wording of this provision is broad, it is not unlimited: the person has to be authorized, their approach has to be at a reasonable time(s), the request has to be related to enforcement of the ITA and it is restricted to "inspect[ing], audit[ing] or examination[s]."

If you are subject to such a "compliance audit" you will want to have your accountant involved as soon as possible in the process.

If, however, you are audited and shortly thereafter charged with an offence under the ITA speak with your lawyer as this "audit," it may have violated s. 7 of the Charter and the Jarvis principles.

S. 231.2(1) ITA: Requirements To Provide Information and Documents ("RPIDs")

If CRA wants you (or a third party) to produce (a) information or (b) any document the Minister of National Revenue ("MNR") may, for any purpose related the ITA, give notice served to you, or that third person, personally requiring production, within a reasonable time, of stipulated materials listed in the notice: Tower, above, s. 17.

Like you, CRA must follow the wording of s. 231.1(1) ITA (Ludmer v. Canada, [1995] 2 F.C. 3 (F.C.A.), CHEVALIER D.J. at p. 17).

CRA does get this wrong from time to time. Just how serious their error is you can discuss with your lawyer. An irregular RPID doesn't necessarily mean the evidence will be excluded, but the mere possibility is sufficient to justify your lawyer thoroughly reviewing the memoranda, RPIDs and related materials for errors.

Only the MNR (or his delegate) can issue RPIDs. RPIDs must be subject to prior approval and the delegate must act in a quasi-judicial manner; or in other words, if they don't act unreasonably.

The Supreme Court of Canada has held that a taxpayer may have substantive defences to successfully attack RPIDs and any resulting prosecution (McKinlay Transport), defence which include:

1) unauthorized fishing expeditions by CRA (James Richardson & Sons, Ltd. v. M.N.R. [1884]1 S.C.R. 614 at p. 623), and

2) there is no a genuine and serious inquiry into a taxpayer's liability (relying on Canadian Bank of Commerce v. A.G. Canada (1962), 35 D.L.R. (2d) 49).

The court ruled that the test is objective, which means that what's important is statutory compliance not CRA's good faith.

If the Requirement power was used improperly and all of the resulting information was obtained in violation of the Charter then your lawyer may ask the Court to exclude the evidence: Charter s. 24(2).

If search warrants were obtained "based solely on information gleaned in violation of the Charter [those warrants] are invalid": R. v. Evans, [1996] 1 S.C.R. 8 at para. 26.

S. 231.2(2) ITA: Unnamed Persons

The MNR shall not impose on any third party a RPID to provide information or any document relating to any one, or more, unnamed persons without prior judicial authority.

The Supreme Court of Canada has held that warrantless searches are prima facie a violation of s. 8 of the Charter: R. v. Collins, [1987] 1 S.C.R. 265 per LAMER, J. at para. 22 and it then becomes a question of fact whether that violation was "reasonable."

To rebut this presumption the onus will be on the Crown/CRA; but normally a "search will be reasonable if it is authorized by law, if the law itself is reasonable and if the manner in which the search was carried out is reasonable" (Collins, at para. 23).

In other words, an RPID will be legal if:

* the ITA was followed, exactly (Tower);

* if it was done in the civil context (McKinlay Transport);

* if there was a genuine and serious inquiry into a taxpayers liability (Canadian Bank of Commerce); and

* the taxpayer was named (s. 231.2(2) ITA; Artistic Ideas Inc. v. Canada (CRA), 2004 FC 573 (F.C.T.D.) per SNIDER, J.);

And, an RPID will not be valid and enforceable if:

* the ITA was not followed;

* if the MNRs delegate didnt act quasi-judicially;

* if the RPID was used as part of an investigation (Jarvis);

* if CRA was "fishing" (Richardson & Sons); and

* if CRA didn't obtain prior authorization for the RPID (Hunter v. Southam Inc., [1984] 2 S.C.R. 145 DICKSON J.)

This is a simplified version of the law, only your lawyer can give you advice about your particular situation.

S. 231.3(1) ITA: Search Warrants

CRA can apply to a judge for a search warrant ("SW") without notice to you.

A CRA officer must swear an Information to Obtain (s. 231.3(2) ITA) and under s. 231.3(3) ITA a judge may issue the search warrant if they are is satisfied that there are reasonable grounds to believe:

(a) an offence under the ITA was committed;

(b) a document or thing that may afford evidence of the offence; and

(c) the building to be searched is likely to be contain such a document.

S. 231.3(3) ITA now reads "may issue" rather than "shall" because the Baron v. Canada, [1993] 1 S.C.R. 416 declared the former invalid as a violation of s. 8 Charter because it unduly restricted judicial discretion in refusing to issue search warrants. So you can see judicious challenges can change not only the results, but the law as well.

S. 487 Criminal Code

Provides an alternative procedure for applying for SWs, similar to the foregoing; which in practice, CRA uses regularly; as you might imagine s. 487 has been extensively litigated and it is generally well understood by the criminal bar.

S. 231.5(1) ITA

Where any document is seized, inspected, examined or provided under ss. 231.1 to 231.4 ITA the CRA officer my make copies. Such copies, when certified, have the same probative force as the original.

S. 231.5(2) ITA

No person shall hinder, molest or interfere with any person doing anything he is authorized to do under ss. 231.1 to 231.4. If you think that CRA has violated your rights or otherwise failed to comply with the ITA V then call your lawyer. Don't try to stop them yourself.

S. 238(1) ITA

Provides that every "person" who has failed to file a return as and to comply with the sections of the ITA listed therein is guilty of an offence and in addition to any other penalty (e.g., s. 162(1) ITA). If convicted a taxpayer is subject to a fine and imprisonment

The Bottom Line

Although the CRA uses these provisions frequently, they don't always do so correctly.

Some CRA officers have testified that they followed CRA "practices" rather than the ITA per se (e.g., s. 231.2(2) ITA), but as only the statutory provisions that are binding this may give your lawyer grounds to challenge CRA use or reliance on any materials found.

Parliament has spoken, but sometimes CRA hasn't listened; that "failure to communicate" may, if your lawyer decides circumstances warrant it, may justify challenging CRA on their use of their requirement powers.

Staff WriterFor - Tax Evasion Resources - http://www.taxevasionresources.com


MORE RESOURCES:

Taxes - Google News

The Facts About Who Pays the Most in Taxes in America - Daily Signal


Daily Signal

The Facts About Who Pays the Most in Taxes in America
Daily Signal
There's another side to taxes that goes completely unappreciated. According to a 2013 study by the Virginia-based Mercatus Center, Americans spend up to $378 billion annually in tax-related accounting costs, and in 2011, Americans spent more than 6 ...
How the Swindlers of Silicon Valley Avoid Paying Taxes The Nation.

all 4 news articles »

Trump, in Heritage speech on taxes, vows to return to Reagan-era economic boom - Politico


Politico

Trump, in Heritage speech on taxes, vows to return to Reagan-era economic boom
Politico
“Working closely with the Heritage Foundation, Ronald Reagan cut taxes to unleash the economic miracle of the 1980s,” Trump said during his address at the think tank's annual President's Club Meeting. “You understand that lower taxes mean bigger ...
Today in Conservative Media: What Does Tax Reform Mean, Anyway? Slate Magazine (blog)
The dirty secret of tax reform: It's all about cutting business taxes Yahoo Finance
National Review National Review
CBS News  - Daily Signal  - Fox News
all 217 news articles »

Trump focuses on taxes in red meat speech before conservatives - CNN


CNN

Trump focuses on taxes in red meat speech before conservatives
CNN
"You understand that lower taxes mean bigger paychecks, more jobs and stronger growth," he said. He called on the audience to help push the plan, which is still in the works, through Congress. "We need the help of The Heritage Foundation and everyone ...

and more »

Texas taxes may be low, but they're poorly imposed - Houston Chronicle


Houston Chronicle

Texas taxes may be low, but they're poorly imposed
Houston Chronicle
Most economists agree that how a government levies taxes is just as important as how much it collects. And each year, the right-leaning Tax Foundation tries to call attention to this principle by publishing the State Business Tax Climate Index to ...
2018 State Business Tax Climate Index Tax Foundation
Report: Illinois ranks 29th in tax climate for business Chicago Tribune
Texas business tax climate ranks 13th in nation Chron.com

all 44 news articles »

Rauner's tax returns: $91 million in taxable income for '16 - Chicago Tribune


Chicago Tribune

Rauner's tax returns: $91 million in taxable income for '16
Chicago Tribune
Bruce Rauner had more than $91 million in state taxable income in 2016, a significant drop from the $188 million he and wife Diana reported for 2015, according to tax returns the governor's office released Tuesday. The Rauners paid $19.5 million in ...
Gov. Rauner releases 2016 tax returns KFVS

all 29 news articles »

Proposal would provide $1.1 billion worth of property tax relief - Omaha World-Herald


Omaha World-Herald

Proposal would provide $1.1 billion worth of property tax relief
Omaha World-Herald
Steve Erdman of Bayard said the proposal would provide income tax credits equal to 50 percent of the property taxes paid to school districts. The credits would be refundable, meaning that people would get a check for the amount by which the new credit ...

and more »

Bannon becomes threat for Senate GOP on taxes - The Hill


The Hill

Bannon becomes threat for Senate GOP on taxes
The Hill
A win on tax reform could quiet Bannon, Graham suggested. “If people see us delivering on health care and taxes … all of our guys and gals are going to win,” Graham said. “But if we go into 2018 saying, 'well, we just don't have enough Republicans,' ...
Senate GOP Survives the First of Many Votes on the Road to Cutting Taxes New York Magazine
Trump's tax proposal won't actually help the middle class. Here's what would. Washington Post
Paul Ryan: Claim that GOP tax overhaul favors wealthy is 'class warfare rhetoric' Madison.com
OregonLive.com  - Vox
all 159 news articles »

Emanuel may opt to raise 911, Uber taxes, setting aside council ... - Chicago Tribune


Chicago Tribune

Emanuel may opt to raise 911, Uber taxes, setting aside council ...
Chicago Tribune
Chicago aldermen floated raising parking rates, licensing bicycles and even icrasing a little-noted pop tax to raise more money for the city.

and more »

White House fears Senate will sink tax cuts - Politico


Politico

White House fears Senate will sink tax cuts
Politico
President Donald Trump and Mitch McConnell stood side by side at the White House Monday afternoon to declare they're “together totally” and “very united” heading into this fall's tax reform battle. But behind the scenes, Trump, his administration and ...
Trump and McConnell: We're friends — and we're going to get tax reform done this year CNBC
Collins Likely to Support Senate Resolution Key to Tax Reform Bloomberg
Trump has a credibility problem on tax reform Yahoo Finance
Fox News
all 1,180 news articles »

Americans would see up to a $9000 raise if US cuts corporate taxes, says Trump economic advisor - CNBC


CNBC

Americans would see up to a $9000 raise if US cuts corporate taxes, says Trump economic advisor
CNBC
American workers would get a pay raise if Republicans are able to reduce corporate taxes, argued the chairman of President Donald Trump's Council of Economic Advisers. Cutting the U.S. corporate rate from 35 percent to 20 percent would provide ...
Trump's Top Economist Says Corporate Tax Cuts Will Lift Workers' Wages New York Times
White House: $4000 more for families with business tax cuts Chicago Tribune
Donald Trump's tax plan isn't going to be a $4000 windfall for American households Quartz
Bloomberg  - The Hill  - WhiteHouse.gov  - Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
all 118 news articles »

LargeFriends.com - the best dating site for plus-sized singles!
SuccessfulMatchCentral.com - the best dating site for plus-sized singles!

PreLaunchX

PrimeNews Domain Is For Sale - $5,000 For Enquiries eMail Us

© www.PrimeNews.biz - 2012

home | site map | links