Let us create a 3D eBook for you!
Let us create a 3d Digital eBook for you! DigyCat.com

To Tax or Not to Tax - This is the Question


To tax or not to tax - this question could have never been asked twenty years ago.

Historically, income tax is a novel invention. Still, it became so widespread and so socially accepted that no one dared challenge it seriously. In the lunatic fringes there were those who refused to pay taxes and served prison sentences as a result. Some of them tried to translate their platforms into political power and established parties, which failed dismally in the polls. But some of what they said made sense.

Originally, taxes were levied to pay for government expenses. But they underwent a malignant transformation. They began to be used to express social preferences. Tax revenues were diverted to pay for urban renewal, to encourage foreign investments through tax breaks and tax incentives, to enhance social equality by evenly redistributing income and so on. As Big Government became more derided - so were taxes perceived to be its instrument and the tide turned. Suddenly, the fashion was to downsize government, minimize its disruptive involvement in the marketplace and reduce the total tax burden as part of the GNP.

Taxes are inherently unjust. They are enforced, using state coercion. They are an infringement of the human age old right to property. Money is transferred from one group of citizens (law abiding taxpayers) - to other groups. The recipients are less savoury: they either do not pay taxes legally (low income populations, children, the elderly) - or avoid paying taxes illegally. But there is no way of preventing a tax evader from enjoying tax money paid by others.

Research demonstrated that most tax money benefited the middle classes and the rich, in short: those who need it least. Moreover, these strata of society were most likely to use tax planning to minimize their tax payments. They could afford to pay professionals to help them to pay less taxes because their income was augmented by transfers of tax money paid by the less affluent and by the less fortunate. The poor subsidized the tax planning of the rich, so that they could pay less taxes. No wonder that tax planning is regarded as the rich man's shot at tax evasion. The irony is that taxes were intended to lessen social polarity and friction - but they achieved exactly the opposite.

In economies where taxes gobble up to 60% of the GDP (France, Germany, to name a few) - taxes became THE major economic disincentive. Why work for the taxman? Why finance the lavish lifestyle of numerous politicians and bloated bureaucracies through tax money? Why be a sucker when the rich and mighty play it safe?

The results were socially and morally devastating: an avalanche of illegal activities, all intended to avoid paying taxes. Monstrous black economies were formed by entrepreneuring souls. These economic activities went unreported and totally deformed the processes of macroeconomic decision making, supposedly based on complete economic data. This apparent lack of macroeconomic control creates a second layer of mistrust between the citizen and his government (on top of the one related to the collection of taxes).

Recent studies clearly indicate that a reverse relationship exists between the growth of the economy and the extent of public spending. Moreover, decades of progressive taxation did not reverse the trend of a growing gap between the rich and the poor. Income distribution has remained inequitable (ever more so all the time) - despite gigantic unilateral transfers of money from the state to the poorer socio - economic strata of society.

Taxes are largely considered to be responsible for the following:

  • They distorted business thinking;

  • Encouraged the misallocation of economic resources;

  • Diverted money to strange tax motivated investments;

  • Absorbed unacceptably large chunks of the GDP;

  • Deterred foreign investment;

  • Morally corrupted the population, encouraging it to engage in massive illegal activities;

  • Adversely influenced macroeconomic parameters such as unemployment, the money supply and interest rates;

  • Deprived the business sector of capital needed for its development by spending it on non productive political ends;

  • Caused the smuggling of capital outside the country;

  • The formation of strong parallel, black economies and the falsification of economic records thus affecting the proper decision making processes;

  • Facilitated the establishment of big, inefficient bureaucracies for the collection of taxes and data related to income and economic activity;

  • Forced every member of society to - directly or indirectly - pay for professional services related to his tax obligations, or, at least to consume his own resources (time, money and energy) in communicating with authorities dealing with tax collection.

Thousands of laws, tax loopholes, breaks and incentives and seemingly arbitrary decision making, not open to judicial scrutiny eroded the trust that a member of the community should have in its institutions. This lack of transparency and even-handedness led to the frequent eruption of scandals which unseated governments more often than not.

All these very dear prices might have been acceptable if taxes were to achieve their primary stated goals. That they failed to do so is what sparked the latest rebellious thinking.

At first, the governments of the world tried a few simple recipes:

They tried to widen the tax base by better collection, processing, amalgamation and crossing of information. This way, more tax payers were supposed to be caught in "the net". This failed dismally. People found ways around this relatively unsophisticated approach and frequent and successive tax campaigns were to no avail.

So, governments tried the next trick in their bag: they shifted from progressive taxes to regressive ones. This was really a shift from taxes on income to taxes on consumption. This proved to be a much more efficient measure - albeit with grave social consequences. The same pattern was repeated: the powerful few were provided with legal loopholes. VAT rules around the world allow businesses to offset VAT that they paid from VAT that they were supposed to pay to the authorities. Many of them ended up receiving VAT funds paid the poorer population, to which these tax breaks were, obviously, not available.

Moreover, VAT and other direct taxes on consumption were almost immediately reflected in higher inflation figures. As economic theory goes, inflation is a tax. It indirectly affects the purchasing power of those not knowledgeable enough, devoid of political clout, or not rich enough to protect themselves. The salaries of the lower strata of society are eroded by inflation and this has the exact same effect as a tax would. This is why inflation is called the poor man's tax.

When the social consequences of levying regressive taxes became fully evident, governments went back to the drawing board. Regressive taxes were politically and socially costly. Progressive taxes resembled Swiss cheese: too many loopholes, not enough substances. The natural inclination was to try and plug the holes: disallow allowances, break tax breaks, abolish special preferences, eliminate loopholes, write-offs, reliefs and a host of other, special deductions. This entailed conflicts with special interest groups whose interests were duly reflected in the tax loopholes.

Governments, being political creatures, did a half hearted job. They abolished on the one hand - and gave with the other. They wriggled their way around controversial subjects and the result was that every loophole cutting measure brought in its wake a growing host of others. The situation looked hopeless.

Thus, governments were reduced to using the final, nuclear-like, weapon in their arsenal: the simplification of the tax system.

The idea is aesthetically appealing: all tax concessions and loopholes will be eliminated, on the one hand. On the other, the number of tax rates and the magnitude of each rate will be pared down. Marginal tax rates will go down considerably and so will the number of tax rates. So, people will feel less like cheating and they will spend less resources on the preparation of their tax returns. The government, on its part, will no longer use the tax system to express its (political) preferences. It will propagate a simple, transparent, equitable, fair and non arbitrary system which will generate more income by virtue of these traits.

Governments from Germany to the USA are working along the same lines. They are trying to stem what is in effect a tax rebellion, a major case of civil disobedience. If they fail, the very fabric of societies will be affected. If they succeed, we may all inherit a better world. Knowing the propensities of human beings, the safe bet is that people will still hate to see their money wasted in unaccounted for ways on bizarre, pork barrel, projects. As long as this is the case, the eternal chase of the citizen by his government will continue.

About The Author

Sam Vaknin is the author of "Malignant Self Love - Narcissism Revisited" and "After the Rain - How the West Lost the East". He is a columnist in "Central Europe Review", United Press International (UPI) and ebookweb.org and the editor of mental health and Central East Europe categories in The Open Directory, Suite101 and searcheurope.com. Until recently, he served as the Economic Advisor to the Government of Macedonia.

His web site: http://samvak.tripod.com


MORE RESOURCES:

Taxes - Google News

This RSS feed URL is deprecated

This RSS feed URL is deprecated, please update. New URLs can be found in the footers at https://news.google.com/news

10 Ways to Legally Reduce Your 2018 Taxes - Motley Fool


10 Ways to Legally Reduce Your 2018 Taxes
Motley Fool
Homeowners are privy to a number of tax benefits, the most lucrative of which is typically the mortgage interest deduction. Now you could just make your standard 12 monthly mortgage payments in 2018 and call it a day, but if you want to eke out some ...

and more »

Indian government likely to reject Apple's request to delay new import taxes - 9to5Mac


9to5Mac

Indian government likely to reject Apple's request to delay new import taxes
9to5Mac
Wistron assembles iPhone SE models in India for Apple, but the components are all imported. Under a current agreement, most of these components can be brought into the country tax-free, but the government wants to impose import tariffs on more of them ...
Apple, India wrangle over import tax on mobile parts: sources Reuters

all 8 news articles »

Small Investors Face Steeper Tax Bill Under Senate Proposal - Wall Street Journal


Wall Street Journal

Small Investors Face Steeper Tax Bill Under Senate Proposal
Wall Street Journal
A little-discussed provision in the Senate tax bill could lead to a higher tax bill for millions of small investors and cause many to unload stocks before year-end to avoid those costs. Under the Senate's $1.4 trillion tax overhaul, investors would ...

and more »

Most Americans Expect a Tax Refund in 2018 - And That's Not a Good Thing - Yahoo Finance


Yahoo Finance

Most Americans Expect a Tax Refund in 2018 - And That's Not a Good Thing
Yahoo Finance
If there's one thing pretty much all Americans can agree on, it's that taxes are a major burden. Not only does losing a portion of our income constitute a harsh blow, but the process of filing taxes can be downright stressful. But filing hassles aside ...

In Trump's America, Even White People Can Face Poll Taxes, if They Lean Liberal - Daily Beast


Daily Beast

In Trump's America, Even White People Can Face Poll Taxes, if They Lean Liberal
Daily Beast
The Granite State's Republican-controlled state legislature has responded to narrow defeats — we're talking less than a percentage point — to Democrats in the 2016 election by proposing a poll tax that targets college students: a vital Democrat ...

and more »

Precision sacrificed for speed as GOP rushes ahead on taxes - Chicago Tribune


Chicago Tribune

Precision sacrificed for speed as GOP rushes ahead on taxes
Chicago Tribune
The specific legislation that probably will become law, sold as a middle-class tax cut but featuring a massive corporate rate reduction at its center, is moving from release toward passage without any hearings, unusual for a bill of such magnitude. And ...
Susan Collins Says She's Not a Definitive 'Yes' on Taxes New York Magazine
Today in Taxes: Busy Behind the Scenes Wall Street Journal
Republican tax bill would tie the hands of blue-state governments Washington Examiner
Bloomberg  - New York Times  - AZCentral.com
all 257 news articles »

8.8 million Americans face big tax hike if Republicans scrap the medical deduction - Minneapolis Star Tribune


Minneapolis Star Tribune

8.8 million Americans face big tax hike if Republicans scrap the medical deduction
Minneapolis Star Tribune
Anne Hammer is one of millions of elderly Americans who could face a substantial tax hike in 2018 depending on the final negotiations over the Republican tax bill. In her retirement community in Chestertown, Md., it's the big topic of conversation ...
As California burns, Congress plans to slash tax write-offs for fires and other disasters Los Angeles Times

all 29 news articles »

Scoop: Trump's closing argument on taxes - Axios


Axios

Scoop: Trump's closing argument on taxes
Axios
Scoop: Trump's closing argument on taxes. Photo: Alex Brandon / AP. On Wednesday, President Trump will deliver his closing argument on tax reform to an audience made up largely of young people and middle-class families whose personal stories will be ...

and more »

Taxes and the Safety Net - New York Times


New York Times

Taxes and the Safety Net
New York Times
Make no mistake: The tax cuts for corporations and wealthy people that Congress is determined to pass will lead to major cuts to health and economic security for the rest of us. The Congressional Budget Office anticipates that Medicare alone will be ...

and more »

LargeFriends.com - the best dating site for plus-sized singles!
SuccessfulMatchCentral.com - the best dating site for plus-sized singles!

PreLaunchX

PrimeNews Domain Is For Sale - $5,000 For Enquiries eMail Us

© www.PrimeNews.biz - 2012

home | site map | links