Let us create a 3D eBook for you!
Let us create a 3d Digital eBook for you! DigyCat.com

To Tax or Not to Tax - This is the Question


To tax or not to tax - this question could have never been asked twenty years ago.

Historically, income tax is a novel invention. Still, it became so widespread and so socially accepted that no one dared challenge it seriously. In the lunatic fringes there were those who refused to pay taxes and served prison sentences as a result. Some of them tried to translate their platforms into political power and established parties, which failed dismally in the polls. But some of what they said made sense.

Originally, taxes were levied to pay for government expenses. But they underwent a malignant transformation. They began to be used to express social preferences. Tax revenues were diverted to pay for urban renewal, to encourage foreign investments through tax breaks and tax incentives, to enhance social equality by evenly redistributing income and so on. As Big Government became more derided - so were taxes perceived to be its instrument and the tide turned. Suddenly, the fashion was to downsize government, minimize its disruptive involvement in the marketplace and reduce the total tax burden as part of the GNP.

Taxes are inherently unjust. They are enforced, using state coercion. They are an infringement of the human age old right to property. Money is transferred from one group of citizens (law abiding taxpayers) - to other groups. The recipients are less savoury: they either do not pay taxes legally (low income populations, children, the elderly) - or avoid paying taxes illegally. But there is no way of preventing a tax evader from enjoying tax money paid by others.

Research demonstrated that most tax money benefited the middle classes and the rich, in short: those who need it least. Moreover, these strata of society were most likely to use tax planning to minimize their tax payments. They could afford to pay professionals to help them to pay less taxes because their income was augmented by transfers of tax money paid by the less affluent and by the less fortunate. The poor subsidized the tax planning of the rich, so that they could pay less taxes. No wonder that tax planning is regarded as the rich man's shot at tax evasion. The irony is that taxes were intended to lessen social polarity and friction - but they achieved exactly the opposite.

In economies where taxes gobble up to 60% of the GDP (France, Germany, to name a few) - taxes became THE major economic disincentive. Why work for the taxman? Why finance the lavish lifestyle of numerous politicians and bloated bureaucracies through tax money? Why be a sucker when the rich and mighty play it safe?

The results were socially and morally devastating: an avalanche of illegal activities, all intended to avoid paying taxes. Monstrous black economies were formed by entrepreneuring souls. These economic activities went unreported and totally deformed the processes of macroeconomic decision making, supposedly based on complete economic data. This apparent lack of macroeconomic control creates a second layer of mistrust between the citizen and his government (on top of the one related to the collection of taxes).

Recent studies clearly indicate that a reverse relationship exists between the growth of the economy and the extent of public spending. Moreover, decades of progressive taxation did not reverse the trend of a growing gap between the rich and the poor. Income distribution has remained inequitable (ever more so all the time) - despite gigantic unilateral transfers of money from the state to the poorer socio - economic strata of society.

Taxes are largely considered to be responsible for the following:

  • They distorted business thinking;

  • Encouraged the misallocation of economic resources;

  • Diverted money to strange tax motivated investments;

  • Absorbed unacceptably large chunks of the GDP;

  • Deterred foreign investment;

  • Morally corrupted the population, encouraging it to engage in massive illegal activities;

  • Adversely influenced macroeconomic parameters such as unemployment, the money supply and interest rates;

  • Deprived the business sector of capital needed for its development by spending it on non productive political ends;

  • Caused the smuggling of capital outside the country;

  • The formation of strong parallel, black economies and the falsification of economic records thus affecting the proper decision making processes;

  • Facilitated the establishment of big, inefficient bureaucracies for the collection of taxes and data related to income and economic activity;

  • Forced every member of society to - directly or indirectly - pay for professional services related to his tax obligations, or, at least to consume his own resources (time, money and energy) in communicating with authorities dealing with tax collection.

Thousands of laws, tax loopholes, breaks and incentives and seemingly arbitrary decision making, not open to judicial scrutiny eroded the trust that a member of the community should have in its institutions. This lack of transparency and even-handedness led to the frequent eruption of scandals which unseated governments more often than not.

All these very dear prices might have been acceptable if taxes were to achieve their primary stated goals. That they failed to do so is what sparked the latest rebellious thinking.

At first, the governments of the world tried a few simple recipes:

They tried to widen the tax base by better collection, processing, amalgamation and crossing of information. This way, more tax payers were supposed to be caught in "the net". This failed dismally. People found ways around this relatively unsophisticated approach and frequent and successive tax campaigns were to no avail.

So, governments tried the next trick in their bag: they shifted from progressive taxes to regressive ones. This was really a shift from taxes on income to taxes on consumption. This proved to be a much more efficient measure - albeit with grave social consequences. The same pattern was repeated: the powerful few were provided with legal loopholes. VAT rules around the world allow businesses to offset VAT that they paid from VAT that they were supposed to pay to the authorities. Many of them ended up receiving VAT funds paid the poorer population, to which these tax breaks were, obviously, not available.

Moreover, VAT and other direct taxes on consumption were almost immediately reflected in higher inflation figures. As economic theory goes, inflation is a tax. It indirectly affects the purchasing power of those not knowledgeable enough, devoid of political clout, or not rich enough to protect themselves. The salaries of the lower strata of society are eroded by inflation and this has the exact same effect as a tax would. This is why inflation is called the poor man's tax.

When the social consequences of levying regressive taxes became fully evident, governments went back to the drawing board. Regressive taxes were politically and socially costly. Progressive taxes resembled Swiss cheese: too many loopholes, not enough substances. The natural inclination was to try and plug the holes: disallow allowances, break tax breaks, abolish special preferences, eliminate loopholes, write-offs, reliefs and a host of other, special deductions. This entailed conflicts with special interest groups whose interests were duly reflected in the tax loopholes.

Governments, being political creatures, did a half hearted job. They abolished on the one hand - and gave with the other. They wriggled their way around controversial subjects and the result was that every loophole cutting measure brought in its wake a growing host of others. The situation looked hopeless.

Thus, governments were reduced to using the final, nuclear-like, weapon in their arsenal: the simplification of the tax system.

The idea is aesthetically appealing: all tax concessions and loopholes will be eliminated, on the one hand. On the other, the number of tax rates and the magnitude of each rate will be pared down. Marginal tax rates will go down considerably and so will the number of tax rates. So, people will feel less like cheating and they will spend less resources on the preparation of their tax returns. The government, on its part, will no longer use the tax system to express its (political) preferences. It will propagate a simple, transparent, equitable, fair and non arbitrary system which will generate more income by virtue of these traits.

Governments from Germany to the USA are working along the same lines. They are trying to stem what is in effect a tax rebellion, a major case of civil disobedience. If they fail, the very fabric of societies will be affected. If they succeed, we may all inherit a better world. Knowing the propensities of human beings, the safe bet is that people will still hate to see their money wasted in unaccounted for ways on bizarre, pork barrel, projects. As long as this is the case, the eternal chase of the citizen by his government will continue.

About The Author

Sam Vaknin is the author of "Malignant Self Love - Narcissism Revisited" and "After the Rain - How the West Lost the East". He is a columnist in "Central Europe Review", United Press International (UPI) and ebookweb.org and the editor of mental health and Central East Europe categories in The Open Directory, Suite101 and searcheurope.com. Until recently, he served as the Economic Advisor to the Government of Macedonia.

His web site: http://samvak.tripod.com


MORE RESOURCES:

Taxes - Google News

This RSS feed URL is deprecated

This RSS feed URL is deprecated, please update. New URLs can be found in the footers at https://news.google.com/news

Legislator: Delay paying property taxes - Peninsula Daily News


Peninsula Daily News

Legislator: Delay paying property taxes
Peninsula Daily News
It was voted Wednesday night out of the Senate Ways and Means Committee by a party-line vote of 14-10 and sent Thursday to the Rules Committee, prompting Van De Wege to send out a news release late Thursday morning suggesting that Republicans forced ...

and more »

Fed up with skyrocketing property taxes? Don't pay bill in full, say some state lawmakers - KOMO News


KOMO News

Fed up with skyrocketing property taxes? Don't pay bill in full, say some state lawmakers
KOMO News
SEATTLE - It's a plan you might never think would be endorsed by state lawmakers: don't pay your entire property tax bill in full, at least for now. Sen. Mark Mullet (D-Issaquah) and Sen. Dean Takko (D-Longview) say they have a plan to reduce ...

SC tax reform plan would increase cost of groceries, but cut sales taxes - The State


The State

SC tax reform plan would increase cost of groceries, but cut sales taxes
The State
An S.C. House panel unveiled a proposal Thursday to increase the taxes on groceries and power bills in the Palmetto State. But that panel also proposes cutting other taxes as part of a tax-reform package that House Speaker Jay Lucas says will make the ...

An old tax scam — with a troubling new twist - Washington Post


Washington Post

An old tax scam — with a troubling new twist
Washington Post
But because many more people have become aware of the telephone tax-payment trick and learned to ignore the threats, the schemers had to evolve. And the latest twist on this swindle is just pure evil. [Don't be fooled by fake IRS calls or emails]. The ...
Get your tax refund before you file? Here's why it's happening Detroit Free Press

all 58 news articles »

How will tax reform affect my refund next year? - AOL


AOL

How will tax reform affect my refund next year?
AOL
We know that you work hard for your money and often a tax refund may be the biggest check you get all year, so we're here to let you know how the new tax reform legislation may affect your tax refund next year. The new tax law is the largest piece of ...
Keep an eye on your tax planning even as bigger paychecks come your way Detroit Free Press

all 9 news articles »

Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross, who called raising gas taxes a 'horrible idea,' says Trump is considering a hike - CNBC


CNBC

Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross, who called raising gas taxes a 'horrible idea,' says Trump is considering a hike
CNBC
U.S. Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross on Thursday confirmed that President Donald Trump is open to raising federal fuel taxes, saying it's logical to charge drivers for road improvements. Three years ago, Ross denounced calls to raise the gas tax, saying ...

and more »

Tech giants face new UK tax clampdown - BBC News


BBC News

Tech giants face new UK tax clampdown
BBC News
Some of the world's largest technology firms are facing hefty new bills as the UK government moves to fundamentally change the way they are taxed. Google and Facebook are braced for significant changes in the tax system after the Treasury told the BBC ...
Facebook and Google could soon have much higher taxes in the UK, report says CNBC
Tech giants face UK tax overhaul as Treasury says they must pay more Telegraph.co.uk

all 14 news articles »

5 Ways to Avoid Paying Taxes on Your Social Security Benefits - Yahoo Finance


5 Ways to Avoid Paying Taxes on Your Social Security Benefits
Yahoo Finance
If you file an individual return and your combined income is between $25,000 and $34,000, you may owe income tax on up to 50 percent of benefits. Earn more than that, and up to 85 percent of your benefits could be subject to taxes. For those filing a ...

and more »

How the standard tax deduction could cost you - USA TODAY


USA TODAY

How the standard tax deduction could cost you
USA TODAY
“I have my people do a quick little check that says, 'OK, how much did you pay in state income tax on your W-2s, how much have you paid for real estate tax and how much have you paid for mortgage interest?' If those are getting you close to that $12 ...

LargeFriends.com - the best dating site for plus-sized singles!
SuccessfulMatchCentral.com - the best dating site for plus-sized singles!

PreLaunchX

PrimeNews Domain Is For Sale - $5,000 For Enquiries eMail Us

© www.PrimeNews.biz - 2012

home | site map | links